Monthly Archives: September 2013

Arctic Council will study Arctic adaptation

© Marc-Andre Dubois

© Marc-Andre Dubois


I attended the latest Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme Working Group meeting in the Faroe Islands to communicate WWF’s vision for the future of the Arctic. In these remote islands, the Arctic countries were discussing how to approach adaptation actions in the context of a rapidly changing Arctic. The overall idea of this new project is to assess impacts of climate change as well as other changes expected to affect the region like increasing industrialization, shipping and tourism.
In order to assess adaptation actions in the Arctic on short and long term, the group will rely on existing scenarios on global key drivers of change. Expected global developments are likely to impact the Arctic’s people and ecosystems. Global economic development and our increasing demand for natural resources will be one of the important challenges for the Arctic environment during decades ahead.
As emerging economies like Brazil or some Asian nations mature and global human population in 2050 is projected to hit 9.6 billion, there is a pressing need to adopt a forward-looking sustainability framework to guide our management of the environment. WWF understands adaptation through the lens of our relationship with nature which means that adaptation actions in the Arctic region must aim to enhance both human well-being and ecosystem resilience.

Losing an icy friend

Iceberg encountered on a voyage through the Northwest Passage on the ship Silent Sound, Summer 2009. © Cameron Dueck / WWF

Iceberg encountered on a voyage through the Northwest Passage on the ship Silent Sound, Summer 2009. © Cameron Dueck / WWF


As we hit the annual Arctic summer sea ice low, WWF’s Samantha Smith reflects on her years spent in the Arctic, and the lives and cultures we are losing with the ice.
Watching climate change eat away at the Arctic sea ice is like watching a best friend waste away. I have nearly overwhelming feelings of sadness, resignation and even anger at how we could have let this happen – how we continue to let this happen.
I worked for WWF in the Arctic for more than ten years, out in the field with reindeer herders, with scientists in ships by the ice edge and in meeting rooms with ministers. For all of those people, a constant preoccupation is the state of the Arctic’s snow and ice. Ice is the defining characteristic of the high north all year round. Sea ice is the home, maternity ward, and feeding place of the Arctic life we can see, the seals, walrus and polar bears. What we do not see is the springtime melt, when plankton under the ice is released by the melt in a cascade of food, bringing the icy seas to life for fish and seabirds and whales, powering and animating the whole Arctic food web.
This life gives life to the peoples of the Arctic, giving them healthy local food. The sea ice also functions as a road connecting the far-flung communities of the north. These roads are now becoming treacherous, and people are nervous, even fearful of routes used for generations. And there is talk now of ships soon being able to sail through the Arctic during summers.
While I spend no time in the Arctic now, it’s never far from my thoughts. I will always remember the warmth and hospitality of northern communities, the beauty of a single pure white ivory gull; three young walrus popping out of  the water with eyes even wider than my own, a polar bear mom and her fuzzy cub suddenly appearing as we scrambled away to give them space.
This is a world that had essentially changed very little in human history. Now each year, scientists measure how much Arctic sea ice is left. Last year it hit a dramatic new low; today, at the end of the Arctic summer, it is still low and getting ever thinner. People who study the relation between climate and sea ice say that the Arctic has entered a new state, one that may be hard to halt.
The worst part is that we could have done much more to prevent this.  A decade ago, I was part of the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (ACIA). It was the first full-scale review of what climate was doing and was likely to do to the Arctic. Scientists told us then that we must phase out the use of coal, oil and gas, or expect sea ice to melt away.  Looking back, the most frightening thing is the extraordinary decline that has occurred already since the turn of the century. We didn’t listen, we didn’t act and now we are seeing the consequences.
I have a new job now in WWF: I lead our global work on climate and energy. My dream of saving the Arctic is the same, but now I’m doing it by fighting climate change. And to fight climate change, we have to move immediately and on a global scale away from dirty fossil fuels, the single biggest source of the CO2 pollution that is melting sea ice, and to clean and safe renewable energy.
This year, WWF and many other organizations are campaigning to get banks, governments and pension funds to put their money into renewables and take it out of fossil fuels. We want at least US$40 billion in new investments for renewable energy and commitments not to invest in new coal, oil and gas projects. We know this is just a start, but we also know that we have to start now.
Moving investment is one of the most concrete things we can do. Some Arctic countries are beginning to understand this:  the United States, Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Denmark and Finland have all committed to virtually end overseas public funding to coal power . This is making me hopeful, and I hope to see more.
While the Arctic feels far away to many, the solutions to keeping it in something like its present state couldn’t be closer to home. We can all take responsibility to ask our pension funds, our banks and our governments to take this lead.
I’m hoping the anger and sadness I feel at the loss of the sea ice will melt away in the coming years, thawed by the actions of people and governments to stop the ice decline, and to take best care of the ice that remains.

Are the Faroe Islands Arctic?

Rainbow over the Faroe Islands. © Marc-Andre Dubois / WWF

Rainbow over the Faroe Islands. © Marc-Andre Dubois / WWF


This week, I’m in the Faroe Islands in order to attend a meeting of the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), one of six Working Groups of the Arctic Council.
At 62°00’N, the Faroe Islands lie midway between Norway and Iceland, about 4° south of the official boundary of the Arctic Circle. There’s an ongoing discussion about defining the boundaries of the Arctic — highly relevant for these islands, whose government just released an Arctic policy entitled: The Faroe Islands – a Nation in the Arctic. This self-governing region is part of the Nordic family of nations, but are these remote islands Arctic?
On Sunday, our group was invited to participate to a bus tour leaving from Tórshavn, the capital of the archipelago to the Viðareiði . Viðareiði is the northernmost village in the Faroe Islands. It was cold, rainy, windy and beautiful. The islands are located at the heart of the Gulf Stream delivering a cold oceanic climate, which means that the islands don’t experience a long-lasting accumulation of snow. The bus wandered over bridges and tunnels along steep slopes facing powerful North Atlantic waters.
The average temperature in July is an important environmental and biological indicator of ‘northernness’. An average temperature of 10º C  closely corresponds to the treeline. If we use this indicator, large terrestrial areas of the Faroese archipelago mountains are indeed Arctic.
The harsh climatic conditions and the expected consequences of Arctic industrial development here lead me to conclude that the Faroe Islands will indeed be an important stakeholder in the Arctic’s future.

What’s new with the Svalbard polar bears?

In April 2013, our partners at the Norwegian Polar Institute (NPI) began tracking a number of polar bears on Svalbard using GPS-enabled collars. Here’s an update on two of the bears from NPI’s Magnus Andersen. See all bears on the Polar Bear Tracker.

Polar bear N26135


N26135 is continuing her journey far into Russian territory. She crossed the Barents Sea, walked south of Franz Josef Land, passed the northern tip of Novaya Zemlya and continued all the way to the Severnaya Zemlya archipelago. The ice edge has been receding in a north easterly direction and N26135 has continuously followed the ice.
During the last weeks she has moved to the north, again presumably a response to the ice conditions in the area. In the beginning of September she was at about 82 degrees north and 91 degrees east — that is very far away from Svalbard!
During the next month or so the seasonal ice melt will slow down as temperatures drop, and soon we will see a growing amount of ice again. We are following the movements of N26135 closely and cross our fingers that her collar will continue to transmit, so that we are able to document more of this fascinating journey.
 

Polar bear N23637


The difference in movement patterns between polar bears tagged in the same area in Svalbard is striking, as seen when we compare N23637 and N26135. Where one is crossing oceans the other is simply walking back and forth on a stretch of coastline of less than 100 km.
N23637 is constantly moving, slowly but surely along the coast. She may stop for a few days in one spot, but then continue. We believe that she is searching for food, both marine and terrestrial, and making use of whatever she can find, be it a carcass, plant material or maybe a seal on a piece of drifting glacier ice. She probably knows this area like the back of her paw, and has walked here since she was a cub, together with her mother for the first two years.
Research has shown that several generations of polar bears may stay more or less within the same area in Svalbard, using the same general region for denning and hunting in the same fjords. Fall has come to Svalbard now, the night is darker and the temperature is dropping below zero. Soon the mountain tops will be covered by snow. The bears are waiting for winter to come, and for the ocean to freeze up again.

Arctic states to end foreign investment in coal

Five Arctic states have joined the US in shutting down their government’s foreign investments in dirty coal power. Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland and Iceland joined the US in making the move after a meeting with President Obama in Stockholm.
This is important not only because of the likely reduction in the use of coal for power, but also in the message it sends that six Arctic states are working together and taking seriously their responsibilities to lead the way in taking action on climate change.
Read more…